E. Evans-Pritchard’s specific findings or explore the in more detail?
Anthropologists often distinguish between Witchcraft (an innate, often unconscious psychic power) and Sorcery (the learned use of spells, rituals, or medicines). 2. The Historical School (Historiographical Style) Two styles in the study of witchcraft - School ...
Earlier historians viewed witchcraft trials as a product of "religious fanaticism," while later 20th-century historians (like Keith Thomas and Alan Macfarlane ) began adopting anthropological tools to show that trials were actually driven by "bottom-up" interpersonal tensions in local villages. Research often centers on legal records, the role
It examines how "elite" intellectual ideas (like demonology and Satanic pacts) merged with "popular" peasant folklore (like simple maleficium or herbal magic) to trigger mass trials. Research often centers on legal records
Research often centers on legal records, the role of gender (persecution of women), and the transition from medieval "magic" to modern secular "reason". Comparison of the Two Styles Anthropological School Historical School Primary Method Participant observation (Fieldwork) Archival research (Trial records) View of Witchcraft A functional social system A changing intellectual/legal concept Primary Subject Living non-Western societies Early Modern Europe/North America Explanation for Trials Relieves community stress Result of legal and theological shifts Modern Synthesis: The "New Collaboration"
This school, pioneered by in his 1937 study of the Azande people, views witchcraft as a logical and "intellectually consistent" system rather than a primitive superstition.
It serves as a tool for conflict resolution and social control. Accusations often pinpoint existing social tensions or "veiled critiques" of modern life within a community.